If it's all commercial & military flights causing the problems, why do I see a plane flying back and forth making grid pattern overhead? Commercial flights don't go back and forth in one area. And only in the last few years have the storms had very high destructive winds. How is that not enhanced?
I genuinely encourage that you get onto windy.com, add the contrail plug-in, and also https://map.contrails.org and check out the flights for yourself. They criss-cross all the time.
I would like to know thisbas well. In my area in Spain (rural) there are very few commercial flights that pass and when the do pass they generally go in an East West direction, yet on days when there are chemtrails the lines are crazy and go in every which way imaginable, crisscrossed and sometimes going in circles. Almost invariably when I check flightradar after seeing a plane/trail, there are no flights on the radar in this area.
Such planes are likely remote operated. Whomever or whatever responsible for those flights must be publicly identified and called out. Some have tracked them down to private airports and/or runways and called out not only the pilots (some had no idea of the harm they were causing) but identified the individuals within the company employing the pilots.
This is what I was referring to in my story above. The only person who has confronted a "pilot" of any kind, confronted a cloud seeding pilot. THIS is the story that needs to be corrected.
I say more fabulous proof that these fabulous structures are much older , built with VERY ADVANCED TECH, and are indeed energy generating systems.. There are also tunnels underneath connecting to other parts of the world. This is why I lived in one for 10 years. SK
You must be one of the few that don't have wind. lol
When you have two flight "lanes" that cross each other. At the times the jets are producing contrails there is also wind. While they persist the contrails drift with the wind up there and the next aircraft's contrail will appear parallel to the last.
Let’s simplify and only think about one flight path when contrails are being formed.
A plane leaves a contrail and the cross wind blows it sideways, 10 minutes later another plane, on the same fight path leaves a contrail and you end up with parallel lines.
Then add planes travelling on a perpendicular flight path and you get crosses.
I think most people who know about the chemtrails just want it stopped. I have been looking at the sky for years and there is ahuge difference between contrails and chemtrails. Contrails are mostly water vapor, no? We must at least with a first step, unite and stop the aluminum and other harmful poisons ruining the beauty of the sky and making people sick.
Contrails are convection? What are you talking about? Convection is a vertical current of air caused when the sun hits the ground and heats it. That ground heats the air and makes the air start to warm up, and because that happens it becomes less dense than the air above. Vertical convection happens in the lowest part of the atmosphere. Contrails are rarely below 25,000'.
Ok, so I got a word mixed up. Condensation not convection ...my bad. So I was incorrect with the word but the application still applies as I stated it.
If you need help understanding I will try. Here it is at the level we would have had it in school if you had a good science teacher.
The problem is that if there is an inversion that stops the verical motion. Convection currents CAN reach the stratosphere with a strong thunderstorm, but the heat at the surface just initiates it. That heat does not continue very high. If the air is unstable it will rise on its own to the tropopause and then spread out at that inversion. That's the anvil top you see 50 miles away on the horizon.
Stephen I think you need to look up the definition of convection.
Easy to muddle as there is a hot/cold component involved.
Water vapour needs a condensation nuclei to condense and make clouds.
In the case of contrails that is mostly the particulate matter from aircraft exhaust. When up at 30,000 ft around -40 degrees it forms into ice crystals rather than water droplets creating a type of cirrus cloud. Aviation Induced Cirrus.
Lower down where the temperature is higher the condensing water vapour disperses immediately.
That being said you are correct saying that contrails are full of chemical, exhaust chemicals.
Like I said to Jeff, I take blame where blame is due. I meant condensation not convection. So you all get a good looking out but my statement still applies as I stated with Condensation not convection.
I wonder what the hundred or so studies I have about persistent contrails are really about then?
Water condenses on particulates. The particulates in the case of contrails are from the exhaust. The more particulates and consistent cold temperature the longer they persist. It's very basic atmosphere physics that's been known for 100+ years.
If you were to just be spraying chemicals it's unlikely you would see them from a distance. Just the same as the Jet exhaust when it's not forming contrails.
EJ, it would be great if you could get a flightradar link for any one you see like that. I've been looking for something like that for 2 years. If you say it happens often maybe you can get that on video AND on flightradar and share a link. It is easy to find a military aircraft doing circles. Just today I saw one at 30,000' east of Bakersfield, CA. Loops. Thats what the refuelers do, because they have aircraft refueling from them, and they stay over the airbases in military airspace. https://www.flightradar24.com/397a3dc4 Good chance this will disappear after the KC-135 lands.
I do NOT believe for ONE moment that Dane Wigington is incorrect. He has been studying this for many many years. Also, he is very clear that aluminium, barium and strontium are constituents in the spraying and these would not be present in normal jet fuel. The presence of high amounts of aluminium residues on the ground also explains the increasing combustibility of fires in urban areas and forests
Hello Bryan. Correct. Mr. Wigington may not deliver the most pleasing information, but he's not taking sides nor providing misleading information.
The *Patent* tab - located at the top of his GeoengineeringWatch.org introductory page, provides all the required documentation and history of the situation. Thank you for commenting.
Dear Bryan and Paul. Dane stole (plagiarized) my patent list that you're linking to, but I updated my patent list to include every single weather modification patent in the world (over 1,100).
Furthermore, every chemical Dane is claiming comes from pumps and pipes can be found in jet exhaust (except strontium):
"The detected metallic compounds were all internally mixed with the soot particles. The most abundant metals in the exhaust were Chromium (Cr), Iron (Fe), Molybdenum (Mo), Sodium (Na), Calcium (Ca) and Aluminum (Al); Vanadium (V), Barium (Ba), Cobalt (Co), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Lead (Pb), Magnesium (Mg), Manganese (Mn), Silicon (Si), Titanium (Ti) and Zirconium (Zr) were also detected."
Abegglen, Manuel, et al. "Chemical characterization of freshly emitted particulate matter from aircraft exhaust using single particle mass spectrometry." Atmospheric Environment 134 (2016): 181-197.
Reinette… it IS up to each of us. However, you did not answer the question…. Do you believe DW is wrong or misleading us? And if so, for what reason(s) would he do that?
On another note…. After reading some of Jim Lee’s responses to other posts it seems to me that he’s more interested in making sure we (non-experts) know he is the expert. His tone and attitude come across quite off-putting. Not exactly fostering an environment seeking the truth and “blue skies again.”
Finally, I’m concerned at the harsh shift in your (SOS’s) approach to all this. It seems quite sudden and drastic which causes concern.
Mark D, it hasn’t been a sudden shift. It’s definitely been a journey of the last two years. If you have joined us during our save our skies swarm webinar, you would see us teaching you how to read the skies utilizing radio data, the Appleman chart, to see when and when not to expect this persistent contrails. Again, if I’m the one putting the energy and taking this to the FAA, EPA, and EPA, I’m gonna make sure it matters.
Mark, I agree, I can be a dick. However, facts don't care about your feelings. I'm blunt, I have lost patience, and I'm trying to help you whether you believe me or not. We just want blue, sun shiny skies and we'll never get them unless more people come to the realization that contrails turn into cirrus clouds.
Dane Wigington has been on a mission for some 20 years. As far as I know he is the only person on the planet to have taken a stand exclusively geared to saving and preserving th world we live in. All the information he supplies is factual, e.g. insects reduced by 80% to 90%, poisoned soil, dying forests, contaminated oceans, destruction of ozone layer, reduction of oxygen in the air, etc. According to Dane "they" are releasing in the air millions of tonnes of aluminium, barium and all sorts of other chemicals. The effects on insects and microbes are devastating and the same applies to plancton. The idea, inter alia, is to block the sun and cool the planet. Obviously, this is totally insane as the sun provides information, which is essential for the survival of every living being. In addition, the alumuminium they use for this purpose is one of the most toxic substances on earth. It kills everything, not just bees and microbes. It is also implicated in most diseases suffered by humans, in particular Alzheimers, Parkinsons etc. It is very difficult to remove it from the human body, only sylicic acid will do the tric (you have to drink Volvic mineral water). One of its byproducts, fluoride, is in most toothpastes and mouth-related products. It is implicated in 176 diseases and it dessicates your pineal gland, which means that your mental functions suffer, i.e. you become "stupid". Anyway, I do not wish to make this comment too long. Your agenda is unclear to me. Are you trying to justify geoengineering or to reduce the use of so-called fossil fuels? Obviously, that is a misnomer because neither oil nor coal is a fossil-based fuel. Both they and their derivatives have the advantage of being completely biodegradable and do not actually add to the ongoing environmental contamination, which is caused by the toxins we release into the environment on a daily basis such as detergents, sprays, insecticides, pesticides, disinfectants and so on. Many of these are forever chemicals (pfas) that will never be removed. Anyway, I think Dane Wigington should be praised and actively supported.
I have just received Dane Wigington's latest report (16/02/2025). Please watch it. It describes an absolute nightmare scenario throughout the US in the coming week - caused by "climate engineering".
Dane Wigington offers a partial solution though it would be a huge step in the right direction. By stopping geoengineering, i.e. by no longer spraying millions of tons of toxic chemicals on an ongoing basis we would enable the oceans and forests to recover to a significant degree. The function of these areas is the renewal and restoration of the planet. If it is not exercised the planet will eventually perish. An equally serious problem is the production and use of plastics because plastic nanoparticles prevent the proper functioning of the oceans and, obviously, continually increase the contamination of the earth.
A somewhat peculiar comment. Obviously, Dane Wigington does not have the power to stop the planes from flying and spraying. He is appealing to the people in charge to do this.
You have lost your way, Reinette. Or did you always plan to throw us under the bus?
How vile, watching you and Jim taking little passive aggressive jabs at me.
I should’ve listened to those little red flags that I felt when you started fundraising for save our skies. I should’ve listened to the people you burned while building your platform and asking people for donations for a lawsuit that never came to fruition.
I am nauseated by this entire presentation. I’m nauseated by your ongoing effort to throw Dane under the bus, while promoting a egotistical, long-winder hacker (who is known for harassing others for their efforts, including me).
I’m nauseated that you’re going after commercial flights. Fly less to save the sky? That’s your solution?
Sad. Absurd.
You had an opportunity to help me with a lawsuit to fight the Weather Modification happening in my county. You strung me along. You burned bridges with lawyers.
You promised lawsuits that didn’t exist.
You switched gears multiple times, continue to ask for money, and continue to give Agent Lee a platform to spew out two sides of his mouth?
All I see is you sowing more distraction and confusion from this long winded video.
Rennette has stepped far away from her initial stance on this topic. I remember you saying the sprays were killing our trees and now it's a contrail? Oh boy! Watch this and believe these experts https://youtu.be/Dbc4kSwkPic?si=8_VOkUouUl9AVcMl the 2014 Shasta county board of supervisors hearing on chemtrail sprays.
I didn't know who Reinette was before the webinar. I admit I just watched little snippets. I didn't need to hear that misdirection and propaganda. We know better than that! It was almost comical to hear Reinette saying it's condensation and to follow the plane paths on Windy app. WTF! I ain't going to tell nobody nothing. Literally, none of it made any sense to a die hard CHEMTRAIL hater like myself. Glad you reamed her a good one Kat. 👍
I am greatly surprised by this article. Dane Wigington (geoengineeringwatch.org) has been studying this for many many years and produces strong evidence to show the planned and co-ordinated nature of the spraying of aluminium, barium and strontium - all things that are not constituents in normal jet fuel. The presence of high amounts of aluminium residues on the ground also explains the increasing combustibility of fires in urban areas and forests. It is also common sense that the grid-like pattern of trails in the sky is much more consistent with planned chemical spraying than commercial flights
Over and beyond this, it is well known that there are "dimming" projects well underway operating under the delusion that the planet can be saved by dimming the sun - all under the over-arching myth that the planet is heating up and we are all going to die unless they "save us"
It also needs to be taken into account that governments now FULLY ADMIT that they are using geo-engineering methodologies including high energy beams
Should any of this be of any surprise? Not when you consider that Lyndon Johnson said "he who controls the weather controls the world"
The old "cloud seeding" furphy has always been the standard explanation handed out by governments when confronted with claims of more nefarious activities. Geo-engineering has advanced way way beyond "cloud seeding"
One thing seems clear for sure - the skies are being saturated with a double whammy of BOTH jet fuel exhaust AND and non-fuel elements
There is way more people than just those two who have clear cut evidence of what's being sprayed on us and the world. Disagreement is ok as long as it's handled correctly. The only misdirection I can tell is believing there is nothing to worry about...
it is well known that there are "dimming" projects well underway
Name ONE.
Show me a link.
Provide proof.
All of the points you're making seem obviously true except that there is no proof of a secret government program actively deployed to block out the sun.
If you were paying attention, the ETC Group and Hand Off Mother Earth (HOME) have shut down 4 geoengineering experiments, while neither I nor Dane have ever shut down one.
The proof is in the pudding. I assume there is a program because dozens of jets fly over my house everyday, in rural Vermont. Why would commercial jets fly straight up from the horizon? And the clouds, if you’re an expert explain the clouds with frequency lines in them.
I sprayed chemicals for mosquito abatement and we used ground foggers to have coverage in a town a crew of us would do on the ground what I have witnessed in the sky. The only thing I agree with is all toxins released from these planes need to be stoped chemical sprays and jet fuels released in legislation but it is ludicrous to deny the military program of chemical releasing by aircraft world wide.
I've been watching Jim Lee and Deceased Mike Morales for over a decade. They are fantastic. The US Gov military is controlling the weather. BEWARE of the Severe storms being created to hit most of the US Tomorrow Sat March 15 2025. It's going to very bad full of tornadoes! Stay safe. Prepare where you'll be when it happens in your area. Straight line Winds of 70 mph all through mid continent of US is NOT Normal folks. That's near hurricane force wind. Be aware please.
Yes. I just don’t think it is all or nothing concerning geoengineering due to aviation. My main concern is the chemicals we are being sprayed with. Nothing has been said about bacteria and others vermin found in our very back yards rained down on us.. I do not have to be a scientist or a meteorologist to see something is very wrong in our environment. Here in Kansas we had a soupy fog for days. The respiratory attacks were clearly seen right afterwards. Today it is a dust storm close to the dust bowl. Is the aviation spewing causing the out of this world winds choking us with this dust. We have wind in Kansas all the time, some at 50-60 mph that doesn’t blow up dust storms that stretch for a whole state and last for days. I will wait to see how long before our next epidemic of respiratory illness and no one will ever convince me of any coincidences. I want to know exactly what I am breathing, drinking, and eating and exactly what is causing my symptoms.
Very few people have had ANY training in weather. It is the fault of our education system. Everyone should understand weather.
Strong storms are a result of a clash of two very different airmasses. If you take a very cold airmass and put it in contact with a humid warm airmass the results are strong storms. Nobody makes that cold air covering an area of several states colder. Nobody makes a large warm airmass from the Gulf of Mexico, laden with warm moist from the water. Push the cold down into the warm air mass and see what happens.
Seeding urea into cirrus cloud layers already laden with nano-metallic particles will force precipitation down to the level of lower clouds, invigorating them and cooling the underlying air mass further. If this is continued for long enough the air mass and associated trough in the jet stream will encroach further south than it would otherwise. Conversely, seeding the warm air mass from the Gulf of Mexico (America?) with Silver Iodide, for example, will release vast quantities of latent heat, invigorating storm systems. The artificially enhanced cirrus cloud layer by means of nano-metallic particles will also warm the air mass further so, along with its associated jet stream peak, will encroach further north than it normally would.
I think it’s exactly that attitude- we need to be trained in weather- that is preventing common people from speaking up about they they’re seeing. You don’t have to be trained to see the skies looking gross, unnatural, engineered. I’m on board with zerogeoengineering.com. We need actual inspections of these jets. Most of the jets I see spraying are off radar, so how am I to possibly know what it is or isn’t. We need third party inspections.
One thing is certain: when the sky looks like a chessboard, something is wrong. Also, in the last few years, "cloud seeding" became a lot faster; the whole process takes like 15 minutes. Somehow, I have a hard time believing that these airplanes are dispersing cotton candy.
Also, there is something else that my wife and I photographed during our cross-country tour in the fall of 2022:
I'm not sure what you mean by a chessboard, and, yes, actual cloud seeding is increasing exponentially. This, too, is part of our Petition for Rule Making. As far as "cotton candy," I'm going to encourage you to jump onto the "contrail making" websites I shared above and see, real-time, for yourself. Me explaining myself over and over will never do it.
Ray, I just subd ya. That was a well written news letter and I enjoyed reading it and looking at your pictures. You asked what that black line was and I have seen that black before sprayed out of planes. Actually on twice, but I remember thinking it was either graphene or nanobots. We'll never really know. Just like so many other things, we'll NEVER really know...like the white on your windshield.
Dude, you show pictures of your dirty windshield with bug splats on it, then gish-gallop from photos of contrails and man-made cirrus clouds to cell phone trees, back to your dirty windshield. "Plasmic Material" That's a new one and I gotta admit you did make me laugh. Yo, Grok:
It seems like there might be some confusion in your question. Did you mean "plasmic material" or perhaps "plasmonic material"? Based on your phrasing and common usage, I’ll assume you’re asking about plasmic material and provide an answer accordingly. If you intended something different, feel free to clarify!
In a biological context, "plasmic material" typically refers to the substance or matter related to plasma, which can mean the living material forming cells or the fluid component of certain systems. The term "plasmic" is derived from "plasm," which relates to the substance of cells or a formative material. For example:
Biological Definition: Plasmic material could describe the protoplasm or cytoplasm, the gel-like substance within a cell that surrounds the nucleus and organelles. It’s the "material forming cells," consisting of water, proteins, ions, and other organic molecules essential for cellular function. Think of it as the living, dynamic goo that keeps a cell operational.
However, if you were asking about plasmonic material (a common term in physics and materials science), it’s a different concept entirely, and I can pivot to that if needed. Plasmonic materials are typically metals or metal-like substances (like gold or silver) that support surface plasmons—oscillations of electrons that interact with light in unique ways, often used in nanotechnology or optics for their ability to manipulate light at tiny scales.
Since your question says "plasmic material" and doesn’t hint at a physics context, I’ll stick with the biological angle for now. If you meant something else—like plasmonic materials or even a typo—let me know, and I’ll adjust!
So, assuming plasmic material in biology: it’s the stuff of life at the cellular level, the squishy, active material that makes up the insides of cells. Does that fit what you were looking for, or should I tweak the answer?
Chem planes are retrofitted with Massive tanks which hold different chemicals. I've seen videos of them before scrubbed from Internet now. Passenger planes can't hold tanks thus passenger seating. Some say they put chemicals in the gas and the engines release it. I doubt this very much. No need when they now have Thousands of planes retrofitted to spray us with Chemicals, Nanobots, spider silk, graphene, aluminum, barium, magnesium and what ever else them evil demons dream up. Passenger planes don't leave white streams of Chemicals. Most chem planes are at Military bases. They usually don't co mingle at Local airports. They have this down to a science now. I've been on this for 10 yrs now and following Dane Wigington who has been the Front man on this for 25+ yrs. I'm listening to the pre announcement as I'm texting this. Maybe I'll learn something from this video. I hope so. I'm open to realistic common sense facts and proof.
Stephan, I encourage you get familiar with windy.com, add the contrail finder plug-in, and see for yourself.
My understanding of what is really goihg on after believing something different for nearly twenty years was a hard pill to swallow so I know wht you are going through. You may want a glass of water.
I'm going to listen to your webinar Reinette and I will surely comment after. I truly appreciate your devotion and enthusiasm on this subject. I truly do hope to learn something new in a good aspect. I moved back here from Gulf Breeze Florida in 2019. With three major military bases surrounding Gulf Breeze Florida we never had chemtrails. Here in Columbus Ohio they spray every day all day all night 365 days a year for the last 6 years I've been here. I have not seen a true blue sky in 6 years. I believe all these chemtrail planes are coming out of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton Ohio. I know there's a lot of different aspects to the Chemtrails and cloud seeding, geoengineering and cloud making machines. Anyways, I'll report back after listening to this Reinette. Looks to be a couple hours video. TY
I appreciate you watching the video. Also, do check out Windy.com, add the contrail finder plug-in, observe the skies above you, check out the contrail finder, and you will see it's nailing what is happening over your head!
I do know Dane has initiated an investigation and hearing with this local board of supervisors in Shasta County in 2014, and since then Shasta County has been targeted with fires consecutively year after year. Dane was also in Washington DC. for congressional hearings. But when your own military is in control of the operation and your presidents lead the charge that's one hell of a battle.
Type in reverse image search into your browser. Choose one of the sites. Reverseimagesearch.com is a good one. Upload the image and look at the results.
Would you be so kind to define the word you use as "contrails" in your explanation?
The J4 to J8 fuel transition happened decades ago, yet the increase of pollutants in the sky has exponentially increased only in the last few years, any thoughts why this is the case?
I see no mention of the thousands of drones being deployed in stealth across the western nations, how would these effect the scenerio?
To stop ALL commercial air travel is key to the digital enslavement program of the 4th industrial revolution, this precursive explanation seems convenient and assitive to the 2030 agenda.
I applaud all of you doing this fight for all of us. You all are warriors for the truth and for returning the skies to what they looked like when I was a kid. Big blue beautiful Skies with beautiful big white clouds from God. No streaks or lines, or tic-tac-toe. As a 62-year-old grandmother, that is the number one thing that I worry about on a daily basis, is that my grandchildren are never going to know what a normal sky looks like or be able to appreciate it. God bless you all and may God give you all strength for the fight ahead of you! Don't worry about the naysayers because I get a lot of that myself on my own Facebook page or when I comment on somebody else's. I'm to the age where I really don't care anymore what anybody thinks.
The ONLY time I would ever delete a comment is if it was a nasty, personal attack against another commenter. Which is very rare. So, no, I did not erase one of your comments unless you were nastily attacking somebody -- and as of yet that has not been the case on this thread.
Jae, if you joined us for the 2 and 1/2 hour webinar, did you not see us lay out how to read the skies , how to read as a meteorologist and determine for yourself whether those streaks in the skies are created by commercial aviation or…. The conditions are such that you should not see streaks in the sky, and if you do, this allows you to identify a possible nefarious geoengineering program. I thought we made that point clear throughout. But perhaps not?
No one can deny that increased commercial aviation has contributed to the pollution of our skies, and you are free to pivot & focus your efforts there. However, when you blame fossil fuels that implies another agenda & raises a red flag for me. Our critical problem of weather warfare, geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection, solar radiation management, NEXRAD, ionospheric heaters, CERN, drones, etc can only be solved when all of the contributing factors: commercial & private aviation, the military industrial complex, as well as rogue bad actors both foreign & domestic are reigned in and held accountable. It’s not an either or problem. It’s “all of the above.” We must work together in order to solve this & stop fighting in the foxhole.
What about HAARP and other wether modification practices. I am having a hard time believing that it is just jet fuel in high moisture areas. Why are the contrails in the shape of an X so often? It seems so much more scheduled than just the new airplane engines making the trails?
We will be covering that soon enough. Remember Amy, in 1963, the last time the Clean Air Act addressed jet fuel emissions there were 300,000 flights per year. That was it. We are no up to 43 million flights per year in the U.S. If this continues.... in a year, the skies will be much worse!
If it's all commercial & military flights causing the problems, why do I see a plane flying back and forth making grid pattern overhead? Commercial flights don't go back and forth in one area. And only in the last few years have the storms had very high destructive winds. How is that not enhanced?
I genuinely encourage that you get onto windy.com, add the contrail plug-in, and also https://map.contrails.org and check out the flights for yourself. They criss-cross all the time.
Does this cover Europe as well or is it just for theUS
I would like to know thisbas well. In my area in Spain (rural) there are very few commercial flights that pass and when the do pass they generally go in an East West direction, yet on days when there are chemtrails the lines are crazy and go in every which way imaginable, crisscrossed and sometimes going in circles. Almost invariably when I check flightradar after seeing a plane/trail, there are no flights on the radar in this area.
Such planes are likely remote operated. Whomever or whatever responsible for those flights must be publicly identified and called out. Some have tracked them down to private airports and/or runways and called out not only the pilots (some had no idea of the harm they were causing) but identified the individuals within the company employing the pilots.
This is what I was referring to in my story above. The only person who has confronted a "pilot" of any kind, confronted a cloud seeding pilot. THIS is the story that needs to be corrected.
Yes, I watched her giving interviews on many channels. That was a Cali local plane spraying and pilot she confronted. Not the same 👍
CHECK THIS OUT
https://gregreese.substack.com/p/sar-scan-of-khafre-pyramid-shows?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=706779&post_id=159281192&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=18fuzz&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
I say more fabulous proof that these fabulous structures are much older , built with VERY ADVANCED TECH, and are indeed energy generating systems.. There are also tunnels underneath connecting to other parts of the world. This is why I lived in one for 10 years. SK
The little private airports with the little planes are totally different from What we are Seeing in the sky. Two different entities entirely.
You must be one of the few that don't have wind. lol
When you have two flight "lanes" that cross each other. At the times the jets are producing contrails there is also wind. While they persist the contrails drift with the wind up there and the next aircraft's contrail will appear parallel to the last.
Hope that explains it.
Nope. It doesn’t.
Let’s simplify and only think about one flight path when contrails are being formed.
A plane leaves a contrail and the cross wind blows it sideways, 10 minutes later another plane, on the same fight path leaves a contrail and you end up with parallel lines.
Then add planes travelling on a perpendicular flight path and you get crosses.
Jet fuel exhaust contains soot, sulfur, and the very heavy metals we find in our rain water results.
We breathe in the heavy metals every day coming from the planes.
Will you still try to defend him after all this ?
https://timtruth.substack.com/p/rfk-jr-pushes-entire-cdc-vax-schedule?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=584794&post_id=158712762&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=ieup0&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
You're right, this ain't rocket science, it's atmospheric science. You clearly don't understand how clouds are formed. Google it, Grok it, ChatGPT it.
You need 3 things:
1. Water Vapor
2. Ionization or static (galactic cosmic rays, GCR) or chemiions ( https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1352231099004756 )
3. a cloud "seed" or cloud condensation nuclei (CCN).
Contrails that turn into cirrus clouds are very simple:
Water CONDENSES ON jet exhaust (soot, carbon black) and that forms clouds.
So the chemicals are what water condenses on to make clouds, so they are actually chemical-condensation trails.
Feel free to debunk the most basic atmospheric science there is.
Pass on the AI serfdom. Now people are relying on AI that can be wrong and has been found to be wrong.
I think most people who know about the chemtrails just want it stopped. I have been looking at the sky for years and there is ahuge difference between contrails and chemtrails. Contrails are mostly water vapor, no? We must at least with a first step, unite and stop the aluminum and other harmful poisons ruining the beauty of the sky and making people sick.
NOT!
Contrails are convection? What are you talking about? Convection is a vertical current of air caused when the sun hits the ground and heats it. That ground heats the air and makes the air start to warm up, and because that happens it becomes less dense than the air above. Vertical convection happens in the lowest part of the atmosphere. Contrails are rarely below 25,000'.
Ok, so I got a word mixed up. Condensation not convection ...my bad. So I was incorrect with the word but the application still applies as I stated it.
If you need help understanding I will try. Here it is at the level we would have had it in school if you had a good science teacher.
The problem is that if there is an inversion that stops the verical motion. Convection currents CAN reach the stratosphere with a strong thunderstorm, but the heat at the surface just initiates it. That heat does not continue very high. If the air is unstable it will rise on its own to the tropopause and then spread out at that inversion. That's the anvil top you see 50 miles away on the horizon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mUU69ParFM
Like I said, I take blame where blame is due. Condensation not convection.
Stephen I think you need to look up the definition of convection.
Easy to muddle as there is a hot/cold component involved.
Water vapour needs a condensation nuclei to condense and make clouds.
In the case of contrails that is mostly the particulate matter from aircraft exhaust. When up at 30,000 ft around -40 degrees it forms into ice crystals rather than water droplets creating a type of cirrus cloud. Aviation Induced Cirrus.
Lower down where the temperature is higher the condensing water vapour disperses immediately.
That being said you are correct saying that contrails are full of chemical, exhaust chemicals.
Like I said to Jeff, I take blame where blame is due. I meant condensation not convection. So you all get a good looking out but my statement still applies as I stated with Condensation not convection.
I wonder what the hundred or so studies I have about persistent contrails are really about then?
Water condenses on particulates. The particulates in the case of contrails are from the exhaust. The more particulates and consistent cold temperature the longer they persist. It's very basic atmosphere physics that's been known for 100+ years.
If you were to just be spraying chemicals it's unlikely you would see them from a distance. Just the same as the Jet exhaust when it's not forming contrails.
Bravo. Eddy gets it.
Good chuckle 🤭 Eddy! I'll let you win with your last statement! 👍
Reinette is on board with them
Umadbro? I saw you copy-paste the same comment 7 times under MellowKat's Substack so I know who you are and what you're up to. Put up or shut up.
Nice catch, Jim.
EJ, it would be great if you could get a flightradar link for any one you see like that. I've been looking for something like that for 2 years. If you say it happens often maybe you can get that on video AND on flightradar and share a link. It is easy to find a military aircraft doing circles. Just today I saw one at 30,000' east of Bakersfield, CA. Loops. Thats what the refuelers do, because they have aircraft refueling from them, and they stay over the airbases in military airspace. https://www.flightradar24.com/397a3dc4 Good chance this will disappear after the KC-135 lands.
Carbon emissions are not the problem. There is basically nothing wrong with CO2. On the contrary it is the most important substance on the planet.
That is neither here nor there. Are you actually trying to tell us that Dane Wigington is talking nonsense, i.e. is misinforming us?
I totally agree with you. CO2 is NOT the problem.
Whether DW is misleading us is up to each person to decide.
I do NOT believe for ONE moment that Dane Wigington is incorrect. He has been studying this for many many years. Also, he is very clear that aluminium, barium and strontium are constituents in the spraying and these would not be present in normal jet fuel. The presence of high amounts of aluminium residues on the ground also explains the increasing combustibility of fires in urban areas and forests
Reinette has U turned.
Yoni you gonna shill up and down this thread huh? Trolls gonna troll.
Hello Bryan. Correct. Mr. Wigington may not deliver the most pleasing information, but he's not taking sides nor providing misleading information.
The *Patent* tab - located at the top of his GeoengineeringWatch.org introductory page, provides all the required documentation and history of the situation. Thank you for commenting.
Dear Bryan and Paul. Dane stole (plagiarized) my patent list that you're linking to, but I updated my patent list to include every single weather modification patent in the world (over 1,100).
https://weathermodificationhistory.com/patents/
Protip: none of this proves chemtrails.
Furthermore, every chemical Dane is claiming comes from pumps and pipes can be found in jet exhaust (except strontium):
"The detected metallic compounds were all internally mixed with the soot particles. The most abundant metals in the exhaust were Chromium (Cr), Iron (Fe), Molybdenum (Mo), Sodium (Na), Calcium (Ca) and Aluminum (Al); Vanadium (V), Barium (Ba), Cobalt (Co), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Lead (Pb), Magnesium (Mg), Manganese (Mn), Silicon (Si), Titanium (Ti) and Zirconium (Zr) were also detected."
Abegglen, Manuel, et al. "Chemical characterization of freshly emitted particulate matter from aircraft exhaust using single particle mass spectrometry." Atmospheric Environment 134 (2016): 181-197.
https://climateviewer.com/downloads/Abeggeln-etal-AE2016-aircraft-exhaust.pdf
Try to do some homework before regurgitating Dane's hogwash before throwing shade (pun intended).
Haha! Studying? Or being guided by the likes of Russ Tanner, Marvin Herndon, Mark Whiteside, etc.
"Studying" I don't think that word means what they think it means Eddy. lol
Dane is correct.. except couple of important ..you would say crucial aspects..
https://dontdespairwegotit.substack.com/p/have-we-wasted-time
Reinette… it IS up to each of us. However, you did not answer the question…. Do you believe DW is wrong or misleading us? And if so, for what reason(s) would he do that?
On another note…. After reading some of Jim Lee’s responses to other posts it seems to me that he’s more interested in making sure we (non-experts) know he is the expert. His tone and attitude come across quite off-putting. Not exactly fostering an environment seeking the truth and “blue skies again.”
Finally, I’m concerned at the harsh shift in your (SOS’s) approach to all this. It seems quite sudden and drastic which causes concern.
Mark D, it hasn’t been a sudden shift. It’s definitely been a journey of the last two years. If you have joined us during our save our skies swarm webinar, you would see us teaching you how to read the skies utilizing radio data, the Appleman chart, to see when and when not to expect this persistent contrails. Again, if I’m the one putting the energy and taking this to the FAA, EPA, and EPA, I’m gonna make sure it matters.
Mark, I agree, I can be a dick. However, facts don't care about your feelings. I'm blunt, I have lost patience, and I'm trying to help you whether you believe me or not. We just want blue, sun shiny skies and we'll never get them unless more people come to the realization that contrails turn into cirrus clouds.
Dane Wigington has been on a mission for some 20 years. As far as I know he is the only person on the planet to have taken a stand exclusively geared to saving and preserving th world we live in. All the information he supplies is factual, e.g. insects reduced by 80% to 90%, poisoned soil, dying forests, contaminated oceans, destruction of ozone layer, reduction of oxygen in the air, etc. According to Dane "they" are releasing in the air millions of tonnes of aluminium, barium and all sorts of other chemicals. The effects on insects and microbes are devastating and the same applies to plancton. The idea, inter alia, is to block the sun and cool the planet. Obviously, this is totally insane as the sun provides information, which is essential for the survival of every living being. In addition, the alumuminium they use for this purpose is one of the most toxic substances on earth. It kills everything, not just bees and microbes. It is also implicated in most diseases suffered by humans, in particular Alzheimers, Parkinsons etc. It is very difficult to remove it from the human body, only sylicic acid will do the tric (you have to drink Volvic mineral water). One of its byproducts, fluoride, is in most toothpastes and mouth-related products. It is implicated in 176 diseases and it dessicates your pineal gland, which means that your mental functions suffer, i.e. you become "stupid". Anyway, I do not wish to make this comment too long. Your agenda is unclear to me. Are you trying to justify geoengineering or to reduce the use of so-called fossil fuels? Obviously, that is a misnomer because neither oil nor coal is a fossil-based fuel. Both they and their derivatives have the advantage of being completely biodegradable and do not actually add to the ongoing environmental contamination, which is caused by the toxins we release into the environment on a daily basis such as detergents, sprays, insecticides, pesticides, disinfectants and so on. Many of these are forever chemicals (pfas) that will never be removed. Anyway, I think Dane Wigington should be praised and actively supported.
Okay, what's his solution? Have you heard one yet?
I have just received Dane Wigington's latest report (16/02/2025). Please watch it. It describes an absolute nightmare scenario throughout the US in the coming week - caused by "climate engineering".
This? (2025.02.15):
https://geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-watch-global-alert-news-february-15-2025-497/
Or This? (2025.03.15):
https://geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-watch-global-alert-news-march-15-2025-501/
It is 501.
Dane Wigington offers a partial solution though it would be a huge step in the right direction. By stopping geoengineering, i.e. by no longer spraying millions of tons of toxic chemicals on an ongoing basis we would enable the oceans and forests to recover to a significant degree. The function of these areas is the renewal and restoration of the planet. If it is not exercised the planet will eventually perish. An equally serious problem is the production and use of plastics because plastic nanoparticles prevent the proper functioning of the oceans and, obviously, continually increase the contamination of the earth.
That's not a solution: that's a wish. HOW does he plan to stop planes making clouds?
He doesn't. He has no plan, only fear, and fear sells.
A somewhat peculiar comment. Obviously, Dane Wigington does not have the power to stop the planes from flying and spraying. He is appealing to the people in charge to do this.
I am absolutely blown away.
You have lost your way, Reinette. Or did you always plan to throw us under the bus?
How vile, watching you and Jim taking little passive aggressive jabs at me.
I should’ve listened to those little red flags that I felt when you started fundraising for save our skies. I should’ve listened to the people you burned while building your platform and asking people for donations for a lawsuit that never came to fruition.
I am nauseated by this entire presentation. I’m nauseated by your ongoing effort to throw Dane under the bus, while promoting a egotistical, long-winder hacker (who is known for harassing others for their efforts, including me).
I’m nauseated that you’re going after commercial flights. Fly less to save the sky? That’s your solution?
Sad. Absurd.
You had an opportunity to help me with a lawsuit to fight the Weather Modification happening in my county. You strung me along. You burned bridges with lawyers.
You promised lawsuits that didn’t exist.
You switched gears multiple times, continue to ask for money, and continue to give Agent Lee a platform to spew out two sides of his mouth?
All I see is you sowing more distraction and confusion from this long winded video.
Yuck.
Agreed....more deceptions, distraction and divisiveness here. Predictable moves from the perpetrators & highly paid actors
Rennette has stepped far away from her initial stance on this topic. I remember you saying the sprays were killing our trees and now it's a contrail? Oh boy! Watch this and believe these experts https://youtu.be/Dbc4kSwkPic?si=8_VOkUouUl9AVcMl the 2014 Shasta county board of supervisors hearing on chemtrail sprays.
I didn't know who Reinette was before the webinar. I admit I just watched little snippets. I didn't need to hear that misdirection and propaganda. We know better than that! It was almost comical to hear Reinette saying it's condensation and to follow the plane paths on Windy app. WTF! I ain't going to tell nobody nothing. Literally, none of it made any sense to a die hard CHEMTRAIL hater like myself. Glad you reamed her a good one Kat. 👍
And, really, they are STILL chemtrails, exhaust or not! :))
Yes, obviously BUT if we use that word we are ignored or treated as conspiracy theorists.
Who cares…we all know conspiracy theorist is a psyop to dismiss, diminish, belittle.
And jet exhaust is chemicals. I'm so confused.
Hmmm, cynical, satirical?
I am greatly surprised by this article. Dane Wigington (geoengineeringwatch.org) has been studying this for many many years and produces strong evidence to show the planned and co-ordinated nature of the spraying of aluminium, barium and strontium - all things that are not constituents in normal jet fuel. The presence of high amounts of aluminium residues on the ground also explains the increasing combustibility of fires in urban areas and forests. It is also common sense that the grid-like pattern of trails in the sky is much more consistent with planned chemical spraying than commercial flights
Over and beyond this, it is well known that there are "dimming" projects well underway operating under the delusion that the planet can be saved by dimming the sun - all under the over-arching myth that the planet is heating up and we are all going to die unless they "save us"
It also needs to be taken into account that governments now FULLY ADMIT that they are using geo-engineering methodologies including high energy beams
Should any of this be of any surprise? Not when you consider that Lyndon Johnson said "he who controls the weather controls the world"
The old "cloud seeding" furphy has always been the standard explanation handed out by governments when confronted with claims of more nefarious activities. Geo-engineering has advanced way way beyond "cloud seeding"
One thing seems clear for sure - the skies are being saturated with a double whammy of BOTH jet fuel exhaust AND and non-fuel elements
I'm with Dane!
both are swaying us in incorrect direcitons (Jim and Dane). All on purpose to cause disagreement among us.. and misdirection..
There is way more people than just those two who have clear cut evidence of what's being sprayed on us and the world. Disagreement is ok as long as it's handled correctly. The only misdirection I can tell is believing there is nothing to worry about...
brilliant way to put it! Thank you!
it is well known that there are "dimming" projects well underway
Name ONE.
Show me a link.
Provide proof.
All of the points you're making seem obviously true except that there is no proof of a secret government program actively deployed to block out the sun.
https://weathermodificationhistory.com/interactive-timeline/
https://weathermodificationhistory.com/newspapers/
If you were paying attention, the ETC Group and Hand Off Mother Earth (HOME) have shut down 4 geoengineering experiments, while neither I nor Dane have ever shut down one.
https://climateviewer.substack.com/p/geoengineering-project-halted
https://climateviewer.substack.com/p/david-keiths-scopex-geoengineering
It's fine if you're superficially interested in geoengineering and chemtrails, but please don't discount activists for pointing out painful truths:
1. contrails turn into cirrus clouds
2. cirrus clouds block sunlight
3. if you don't believe contrails exist, you're never going to save our skies.
The proof is in the pudding. I assume there is a program because dozens of jets fly over my house everyday, in rural Vermont. Why would commercial jets fly straight up from the horizon? And the clouds, if you’re an expert explain the clouds with frequency lines in them.
I explained the "frequency lines" in the clouds in the video: with a photo from 1905.
You live under the transatlantic corridor, one of the busiest trans-continental flight zones in the world.
Google it or go to any flight tracking website.
I sprayed chemicals for mosquito abatement and we used ground foggers to have coverage in a town a crew of us would do on the ground what I have witnessed in the sky. The only thing I agree with is all toxins released from these planes need to be stoped chemical sprays and jet fuels released in legislation but it is ludicrous to deny the military program of chemical releasing by aircraft world wide.
Spot on Tiffany
Thank you Reinette. I love your work and support you 1000%.
I've been watching Jim Lee and Deceased Mike Morales for over a decade. They are fantastic. The US Gov military is controlling the weather. BEWARE of the Severe storms being created to hit most of the US Tomorrow Sat March 15 2025. It's going to very bad full of tornadoes! Stay safe. Prepare where you'll be when it happens in your area. Straight line Winds of 70 mph all through mid continent of US is NOT Normal folks. That's near hurricane force wind. Be aware please.
Yes. I just don’t think it is all or nothing concerning geoengineering due to aviation. My main concern is the chemicals we are being sprayed with. Nothing has been said about bacteria and others vermin found in our very back yards rained down on us.. I do not have to be a scientist or a meteorologist to see something is very wrong in our environment. Here in Kansas we had a soupy fog for days. The respiratory attacks were clearly seen right afterwards. Today it is a dust storm close to the dust bowl. Is the aviation spewing causing the out of this world winds choking us with this dust. We have wind in Kansas all the time, some at 50-60 mph that doesn’t blow up dust storms that stretch for a whole state and last for days. I will wait to see how long before our next epidemic of respiratory illness and no one will ever convince me of any coincidences. I want to know exactly what I am breathing, drinking, and eating and exactly what is causing my symptoms.
With ya!
Very few people have had ANY training in weather. It is the fault of our education system. Everyone should understand weather.
Strong storms are a result of a clash of two very different airmasses. If you take a very cold airmass and put it in contact with a humid warm airmass the results are strong storms. Nobody makes that cold air covering an area of several states colder. Nobody makes a large warm airmass from the Gulf of Mexico, laden with warm moist from the water. Push the cold down into the warm air mass and see what happens.
What he said!
I disagree.
Seeding urea into cirrus cloud layers already laden with nano-metallic particles will force precipitation down to the level of lower clouds, invigorating them and cooling the underlying air mass further. If this is continued for long enough the air mass and associated trough in the jet stream will encroach further south than it would otherwise. Conversely, seeding the warm air mass from the Gulf of Mexico (America?) with Silver Iodide, for example, will release vast quantities of latent heat, invigorating storm systems. The artificially enhanced cirrus cloud layer by means of nano-metallic particles will also warm the air mass further so, along with its associated jet stream peak, will encroach further north than it normally would.
I think it’s exactly that attitude- we need to be trained in weather- that is preventing common people from speaking up about they they’re seeing. You don’t have to be trained to see the skies looking gross, unnatural, engineered. I’m on board with zerogeoengineering.com. We need actual inspections of these jets. Most of the jets I see spraying are off radar, so how am I to possibly know what it is or isn’t. We need third party inspections.
Yes they don't teach geography anymore.
One thing is certain: when the sky looks like a chessboard, something is wrong. Also, in the last few years, "cloud seeding" became a lot faster; the whole process takes like 15 minutes. Somehow, I have a hard time believing that these airplanes are dispersing cotton candy.
Also, there is something else that my wife and I photographed during our cross-country tour in the fall of 2022:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/plasmic-material-on-the-windshield
I'm not sure what you mean by a chessboard, and, yes, actual cloud seeding is increasing exponentially. This, too, is part of our Petition for Rule Making. As far as "cotton candy," I'm going to encourage you to jump onto the "contrail making" websites I shared above and see, real-time, for yourself. Me explaining myself over and over will never do it.
"I'm not sure what you mean by a chessboard." ......Really?
I guess you don't look up at the sky!
Ray, I just subd ya. That was a well written news letter and I enjoyed reading it and looking at your pictures. You asked what that black line was and I have seen that black before sprayed out of planes. Actually on twice, but I remember thinking it was either graphene or nanobots. We'll never really know. Just like so many other things, we'll NEVER really know...like the white on your windshield.
Dude, you show pictures of your dirty windshield with bug splats on it, then gish-gallop from photos of contrails and man-made cirrus clouds to cell phone trees, back to your dirty windshield. "Plasmic Material" That's a new one and I gotta admit you did make me laugh. Yo, Grok:
It seems like there might be some confusion in your question. Did you mean "plasmic material" or perhaps "plasmonic material"? Based on your phrasing and common usage, I’ll assume you’re asking about plasmic material and provide an answer accordingly. If you intended something different, feel free to clarify!
In a biological context, "plasmic material" typically refers to the substance or matter related to plasma, which can mean the living material forming cells or the fluid component of certain systems. The term "plasmic" is derived from "plasm," which relates to the substance of cells or a formative material. For example:
Biological Definition: Plasmic material could describe the protoplasm or cytoplasm, the gel-like substance within a cell that surrounds the nucleus and organelles. It’s the "material forming cells," consisting of water, proteins, ions, and other organic molecules essential for cellular function. Think of it as the living, dynamic goo that keeps a cell operational.
However, if you were asking about plasmonic material (a common term in physics and materials science), it’s a different concept entirely, and I can pivot to that if needed. Plasmonic materials are typically metals or metal-like substances (like gold or silver) that support surface plasmons—oscillations of electrons that interact with light in unique ways, often used in nanotechnology or optics for their ability to manipulate light at tiny scales.
Since your question says "plasmic material" and doesn’t hint at a physics context, I’ll stick with the biological angle for now. If you meant something else—like plasmonic materials or even a typo—let me know, and I’ll adjust!
So, assuming plasmic material in biology: it’s the stuff of life at the cellular level, the squishy, active material that makes up the insides of cells. Does that fit what you were looking for, or should I tweak the answer?
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_cb7cadca-486b-4131-8dd7-5d32b4481a0d
your words. They are mine. You a virgo? lol
love you! you are appreciated!!
There are many commercial and passenger flights. Have to acknowledge this.
Chem planes are retrofitted with Massive tanks which hold different chemicals. I've seen videos of them before scrubbed from Internet now. Passenger planes can't hold tanks thus passenger seating. Some say they put chemicals in the gas and the engines release it. I doubt this very much. No need when they now have Thousands of planes retrofitted to spray us with Chemicals, Nanobots, spider silk, graphene, aluminum, barium, magnesium and what ever else them evil demons dream up. Passenger planes don't leave white streams of Chemicals. Most chem planes are at Military bases. They usually don't co mingle at Local airports. They have this down to a science now. I've been on this for 10 yrs now and following Dane Wigington who has been the Front man on this for 25+ yrs. I'm listening to the pre announcement as I'm texting this. Maybe I'll learn something from this video. I hope so. I'm open to realistic common sense facts and proof.
Stephan, I encourage you get familiar with windy.com, add the contrail finder plug-in, and see for yourself.
My understanding of what is really goihg on after believing something different for nearly twenty years was a hard pill to swallow so I know wht you are going through. You may want a glass of water.
I'm going to listen to your webinar Reinette and I will surely comment after. I truly appreciate your devotion and enthusiasm on this subject. I truly do hope to learn something new in a good aspect. I moved back here from Gulf Breeze Florida in 2019. With three major military bases surrounding Gulf Breeze Florida we never had chemtrails. Here in Columbus Ohio they spray every day all day all night 365 days a year for the last 6 years I've been here. I have not seen a true blue sky in 6 years. I believe all these chemtrail planes are coming out of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton Ohio. I know there's a lot of different aspects to the Chemtrails and cloud seeding, geoengineering and cloud making machines. Anyways, I'll report back after listening to this Reinette. Looks to be a couple hours video. TY
I appreciate you watching the video. Also, do check out Windy.com, add the contrail finder plug-in, observe the skies above you, check out the contrail finder, and you will see it's nailing what is happening over your head!
Ballast tanks.
Dane thinks all natural clouds are chemtrails. He is clueless on meteorology.
One question for you. Does DW offer any solutions?
https://substack.com/home/post/p-152120031
Yes Dane does offer solution, (singular)Stop spraying!
That's not a solution. That's a demand with no backing evidence.
This is what a solution looks like:
https://climateviewer.com/enmod/
He sure does.
I just listened to these over the last few days. Old debates.
https://geoengineeringwatch.org/is-there-a-global-climate-engineering-cover-up-a-live-debate-parts-1-and-2/
Jeff has been trying to throw Dane Wiggington under the bus for a while. He is agent Lee’s newer sidekick.
I do know Dane has initiated an investigation and hearing with this local board of supervisors in Shasta County in 2014, and since then Shasta County has been targeted with fires consecutively year after year. Dane was also in Washington DC. for congressional hearings. But when your own military is in control of the operation and your presidents lead the charge that's one hell of a battle.
Have you done a reverse image search of those photographs?
Had to delete! May have been to deep for most people to even understand.
Ok, I will. Can't comment below cause my feed is off the screen! Only have a phn.
Type in reverse image search into your browser. Choose one of the sites. Reverseimagesearch.com is a good one. Upload the image and look at the results.
https://tineye.com is also an excellent reverse image source to check out them chemtrail bottles. =)
I'm always open to learning....
Would you be so kind to define the word you use as "contrails" in your explanation?
The J4 to J8 fuel transition happened decades ago, yet the increase of pollutants in the sky has exponentially increased only in the last few years, any thoughts why this is the case?
I see no mention of the thousands of drones being deployed in stealth across the western nations, how would these effect the scenerio?
To stop ALL commercial air travel is key to the digital enslavement program of the 4th industrial revolution, this precursive explanation seems convenient and assitive to the 2030 agenda.
"ban all air travel, to stop climate change".
Well, not for the rich, just the "common folk".
I look forward to your thoughts.
Kind regards,
Michael.
Agree
I applaud all of you doing this fight for all of us. You all are warriors for the truth and for returning the skies to what they looked like when I was a kid. Big blue beautiful Skies with beautiful big white clouds from God. No streaks or lines, or tic-tac-toe. As a 62-year-old grandmother, that is the number one thing that I worry about on a daily basis, is that my grandchildren are never going to know what a normal sky looks like or be able to appreciate it. God bless you all and may God give you all strength for the fight ahead of you! Don't worry about the naysayers because I get a lot of that myself on my own Facebook page or when I comment on somebody else's. I'm to the age where I really don't care anymore what anybody thinks.
Interesting how my comment disappeared.
Thanks Reinette for showing who you really are, against freedom of speech as well.
The ONLY time I would ever delete a comment is if it was a nasty, personal attack against another commenter. Which is very rare. So, no, I did not erase one of your comments unless you were nastily attacking somebody -- and as of yet that has not been the case on this thread.
Ok. Well it is gone. Poof! And it was not attacking anyone.
Jim Lee is the one who attacks people. It’s disgusting. I have zero respect for such a hypocritical person.
I don’t understand you anymore or him at all.
Thank you for responding. I am sorry but I no longer trust you or your efforts. This is after attending your last 2.5 hr meeting.
Best of Luck to you in collecting donations and your lawsuit. Take care. Again, I appreciate your response.
Sweet blessings.
Jae, if you joined us for the 2 and 1/2 hour webinar, did you not see us lay out how to read the skies , how to read as a meteorologist and determine for yourself whether those streaks in the skies are created by commercial aviation or…. The conditions are such that you should not see streaks in the sky, and if you do, this allows you to identify a possible nefarious geoengineering program. I thought we made that point clear throughout. But perhaps not?
No one can deny that increased commercial aviation has contributed to the pollution of our skies, and you are free to pivot & focus your efforts there. However, when you blame fossil fuels that implies another agenda & raises a red flag for me. Our critical problem of weather warfare, geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection, solar radiation management, NEXRAD, ionospheric heaters, CERN, drones, etc can only be solved when all of the contributing factors: commercial & private aviation, the military industrial complex, as well as rogue bad actors both foreign & domestic are reigned in and held accountable. It’s not an either or problem. It’s “all of the above.” We must work together in order to solve this & stop fighting in the foxhole.
I’d like a refund for my SOS donation!
Rude!
What about HAARP and other wether modification practices. I am having a hard time believing that it is just jet fuel in high moisture areas. Why are the contrails in the shape of an X so often? It seems so much more scheduled than just the new airplane engines making the trails?
We will be covering that soon enough. Remember Amy, in 1963, the last time the Clean Air Act addressed jet fuel emissions there were 300,000 flights per year. That was it. We are no up to 43 million flights per year in the U.S. If this continues.... in a year, the skies will be much worse!