Kamala Harris - the enigma of modern political discourse. Since her ascent to the role of Vice President, her rhetoric has left folks scratching their heads as if her mental faculties turned into a delightful serving of Swiss cheese. Her once-articulate sentences as former California Attorney General and US Senator have become bewildering puzzles, and her popularity has struggled to gain an ounce of traction.
While many Americans might view this as a peculiar form of entertainment, I've always found it rather disconcerting. There must be a method to this madness, for nothing in today's political arena occurs by mere happenstance.
From what I've pieced together, it appears that Kamala has been intentionally guided to sound somewhat air-headed, rendering her an unlikely candidate for the presidency of the United States.
Now, consider the hypothetical scenario in which Joe Biden, or his doppelgänger, takes a final bow and Kamala Harris assumes the mantle of leadership. The collective groans across the nation would be deafening.
This is where the 25th Amendment steps into the limelight, allowing for the appointment of a new Vice President. So, who might be the chosen one, you ask? Well, it seems the prime contender is the individual who is stealthily globe-trotting, from Israel to China, as if he's already won the presidency – none other than Gavin Newsom.
THE 25TH AMENDMENT
The 25th Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1967, outlines the process by which a sitting U.S. president can appoint a new vice president. This amendment provides a mechanism for filling a vice-presidential vacancy, which can occur due to death, resignation, removal from office, or other reasons.
The precedent for this process was set in 1973 when Vice President Spiro T. Agnew resigned amidst allegations of corruption. President Richard Nixon then exercised the 25th Amendment's provisions by nominating Gerald Ford, who was then the House Minority Leader, to fill the vacant vice-presidential position. Ford's nomination was subject to approval by a majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. After gaining the necessary support, Ford was confirmed as the new vice president.
Following Nixon's resignation in 1974, Ford ascended to the presidency, making him the only person in U.S. history to hold both the vice presidency and the presidency without being elected to either office by the American electorate.
This historical example showcases the 25th Amendment's role in facilitating the appointment of a vice president when needed.
NEWSOM HEADING TOWARDS THE THRONE
It's safe to say that Newsom’s got a head start in this race to the throne simply by “playing the part” of US President. I mean, hell, why waste time with a national US campaign when you have the 25th Amendment and a lame President and VP?
California is already owned by China and Newsom is like China's Xi Jinping's mini-me, dutifully executing his California conquest, transforming the once-golden state into a replica of China, complete with its 15-minute cities and a smorgasbord of biometric surveillance systems lurking on every street corner.
I can only imagine that, given Kamala's less-than-stellar popularity, the people will be fervently beseeching the great "salad mixer" to step aside. And when she finally decides to relinquish her throne (perhaps via a lovely severance package), it's a safe bet Newsom will pull a “Gerald Ford” without ever receiving one vote from an American. And let's not kid ourselves; once that leech is perched on the throne, he'll be reluctant to vacate it for at least eight years.
In the realm of political intrigue, it seems, nothing is as straightforward as it appears.
If you find these interviews and articles informative, please become a paid subscriber for under 17¢ a day. I don’t believe in paywalls, but this is how I make a living, so any support is appreciated. Either way…. it’s available to you….
Share this post